Journal of Scientific Papers

ECONOMICS & SOCIOLOGY


© CSR, 2008-2019
ISSN 2071-789X

3.1
2019CiteScore
 
91th percentile
Powered by  Scopus



Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)


Strike Plagiarism

Partners
  • General Founder and Publisher:

     
    Centre of Sociological Research

     

  • Publishing Partners:

    University of Szczecin (Poland)

    Széchenyi István University, (Hungary)

    Mykolas Romeris University (Lithuania)

    Alexander Dubcek University of Trencín (Slovak Republic)


  • Membership:


    American Sociological Association


    European Sociological Association


    World Economics Association (WEA)

     


    CrossRef

     


Quality of life paradox. Well-being ranking of the selected European countries based on hybrid well-being approach

Vol. 13, No 2, 2020

Tomasz Kwarciński

 

Cracow University of Economics,

Cracow, Poland

E-mail: kwarcint@uek.krakow.pl

ORCID 0000-0002-9474-4216

Quality of life paradox. Well-being ranking of the selected European countries based on hybrid well-being approach

 

Paweł Ulman

 

Cracow University of Economics,

Cracow, Poland

E-mail: ulmanp@uek.krakow.pl 

ORCID 0000-0002-1911-8821


 


 

Abstract. The paper aims to measure individual and social hybrid well-being, which takes into account the Quality of Life Paradox and compares the results of the selected European countries by creating a country ranking. The paradox refers to an existing disparity between the real quality of life experienced by people and their subjective state of being happy. The hybrid well-being approach is a philosophically inspired attempt to overcome the weaknesses of both subjective and objective well-being theories. Based on a multidimensional concept of well-being, which follows Sen and Nussbaum’s capability approach, we have applied the fuzzy sets theory to data from the European Quality of Life Survey to calculate the objective well-being of people living in the selected European countries. Then we have measured fittingness of their objective to subjective well-being by the Fitting Index (FI). Finally, we have constructed the countries’ ranking of well-being and compared it to other rankings based on happiness, functionings achievement, and GDP per capita. The analysis shows that the country ranking based on hybrid well-being differs from the one created on the basis of GDP per capita, and it is not perfectly correlated with other rankings. Therefore, this means that the hybrid well-being based ranking may contain additional information as compared to other rankings. The paper also indicates that citizens of wealthier countries, living in relatively high-quality circumstances, do not have a lower level of subjective well-being (happiness) more often than their counterparts from the Eastern European countries.

 

Received: December, 2019

1st Revision: March, 2020

Accepted: June, 2020

 

DOI: 10.14254/2071-789X.2020/13-2/12

JEL ClassificationI31, I39, D63

Keywords: hybrid well-being, capability approach, quality of life, happiness

 

 

Last visited products

Can internet in schools and technology adoption stimulate productivity in emerging markets?
Driving sustainable and competitive transition in enterprise performance management and measurement: The changing role of women in the Japanese labour market
Demographic and Human Capital Heterogeneity in Selected Provinces of Turkey: A Scenario Analysis Using Multi-dimensional Population Projection Model